Thomas McAtee posted on August 01, 2011 00:16
August 2011 - Navy
By CAPT Tom McAtee
Health care costs new threat
to U.S. Military
The Pentagon predicts that the cost of
taking care of its troops and retirees will
keep growing. That will be a major problem
since, even today, the Pentagon says
pension and health care costs are eating
the U.S. military alive. Retired Marine Maj.
Gen. Arnold Punaro, a member of the
Defense Business Board that advises the
Pentagon on its financial operations, gets a
lot of hate mail because he’s talking about
something a whole lot of people don’t want
to hear about: the rising costs of military health and
pension benefits. “General Motors did not start out to
be a health care company that occasionally built an
automobile,” he says. “Today, we’re on the path in the
Department of Defense to turn it into a benefits company
that may occasionally kill a terrorist.”
Secretary Gates sees the problem, too. “The Defense
Department runs the risk of the fate of other corporate
and government bureaucracies that were ultimately
crippled by personnel costs,” he said, “in particular, their
retiree benefit packages.” Here’s what Gates was talking
about: In the past decade, military health care costs more
than doubled. They account for $52.5 billion in next
year’s proposed budget. Retirees’ pay represents another
$50 billion or so a year. People once worried that the cost
of a fighter jet or bomber program would devour the
military’s budget. Now those concerns rise over health and
pension costs. Let’s zoom in on health care. Gates says
the average federal worker who is not in the military pays
about $4,000 a year for family coverage. The military
has its version of health insurance. It’s called Tricare.
“The cost of Tricare for a family, for a year, is $460,”
Gates says. That is, $460 is the annual fee for workingage
retirees – the group Gates has been trying to get to
pay a little bit more. But it’s not easy. Just as GM had a
union to contend with, Gates has his own challenge:
Congress. “The first two years I was in this job in the
Bush administration, I went up to the Hill dutifully each
year with a request for a tiny increase in the fee for
Tricare and got my head lopped off,” Gates said. “And so,
the third year, I didn’t try. Now we are asking to move
it up to $520, $5 a month for family coverage.” Still,
Gates is running into resistance. Why? You can’t compare
military benefits to benefits in the civilian world, because
the career of someone in the military is often so much
harder. Although most think $5 a month as reasonable,
the question remains – “What comes next?”
Veterans groups say if the Department of Defense
wants to cut costs, there are many other ways to do it.
Tougher Physical Fitness
Assessment (PFA) coming
New rules will make passing the
physical fitness assessment more difficult
than ever before.
There are no changes to how the body
composition assessment and the physical
readiness test are conducted, but there are
administrative revisions that make the PFA
easier to fail. The policy will limit Sailors
to two chances to pass the PRT per cycle,
prohibit extreme weight-loss techniques
and change policies for medical waivers.
Sailors who fail the PFA three times in four years are
immediately processed for separation. And a failure in
either the physical readiness test or body composition
assessment means you’ve failed the full physical fitness
assessment. The most dramatic change is a tightening
of the so-called “bad day” rule, which allowed Sailors to
retake the PRT or BCA theoretically as many times as
needed to pass.
But under the new rules, a Sailor who fails the BCA
cannot retest that portion, which translates to an overall
PFA failure. If you fail the PRT, you have 24 hours to ask
for a do-over and, then, a week to run the PRT a second
and final time. The commanding officer still has discretion
to approve or deny the second chance, but you can get
only one do-over per cycle. The old policy allowed for
differences among commands. For example, one CO
could give a Sailor several chances to pass the PRT while
another would give just one. Sanctuary for senior
Sailors is also out. Under the old policy, Sailors with 18
years or more who failed the PFA three times in four
years were allowed to stay in the Navy until they
reached 20 years, allowing them to retire with benefits.
Under the new rule, these Sailors will be processed for
separation without benefits, just like Sailors who haven’t
served as long. With the new rules, the Navy is cracking
down on extreme weight-loss and tape-test tricks, such
as shedding water weight by exercising in saunas, using
sweat wraps, taking laxatives and applying hemorrhoid
cream on the abdomen to shrink the waistline. Also,
medical waivers will be handled differently. If you
request two medical waivers for the same condition
within one year, or three medical waivers in four years,
you will have to go before a medical evaluation board.
That board’s decision could lead to a medical discharge.
Two aspects of the PRT are out. First, the sit-and-reach
is gone. Second, the number of scoring categories has
been reduced from 12 to five. The low, medium and high
subcategories are gone, leaving outstanding, excellent,
good, satisfactory and failure.